The Logical Reasoning section is one of the most important sections of CLAT. It directly tests your logical skills while other sections of the paper indirectly test your propensity to succeed in the field of law.
Also, this section acts as a tiebreaker in case two or more students score the same marks. There are many instances of students getting the same marks and their rank is decided only by the marks of the logical reasoning section.
Hence, it becomes very important to prepare for this section properly and not neglect it. Fortunately, this is a scoring section. The only tools you need in your arsenal to achieve this are good reading speed and sound comprehension. The requirement of prior knowledge is gone after the change in the pattern applied after CLAT 2020.
So, you don’t need to learn a lot of theory, all you have to do is sharpen your guessing skills!
About CLAT 2022 Logical Reasoning
The Logical Reasoning section usually consists of around 35-40 questions. You get 1 mark for every correct answer and a 0.25 mark is deducted for the wrong answer. In CLAT 2021, there were 8 passages with 5 questions each giving a total of 40 questions.
This section had the most number of questions out of all, thus giving it a lot of importance and importance. Usually, 90% of the total number of questions in that section will be a good number of attempts, provided the accuracy is good.
Here are 4 basic tips to tackle logical reasoning in the Law Entrance Examination, especially CLAT:
1. Analytical Problem Solving > Knowledge of Law
Admissions are the gateway to law schools. They are conducted at a stage when the student has not yet formally studied law. Accordingly, the purpose of the Logical Reasoning section is not to test your vast knowledge of the law, but only to assess your ability to analyze basic logical problems. If you are weak in any subject you can join the best CLAT coaching in Lucknow for CLAT 2022.
If you look at the previous year’s papers, you will see that references to complex logical jargon have been kept to a minimum.
When it comes to the gateways of the law it will not help you to memorize the statutes and prepare long complicated notes on the different types of laws. You have enough time to engage in these activities when you enter law school, but for now, you should put more emphasis on developing your analytical skills.
That being said, you shouldn’t completely disregard logical knowledge. A rudimentary understanding of topics like contracts, torts, the law of offenses, and constitutional law will certainly help you to understand logical reasoning questions effectively.
For example, this year, the questions were mainly from the Indian Contract Act, Torts, the Indian Penal Code, etc. Logical Aptitude (factual) questions are also likely to be asked, although there were none this year.
Therefore, it is necessary to have some prior knowledge, although it is not mandatory. But, since the topics are from subject areas like contracts, torts, etc., prior knowledge can prove to be a great advantage as your reading speed will increase by getting familiar with the topics.
Thus, it is a benefit that you should not miss out on. Read the important topics that come under the above-mentioned subject areas. For example, under Torts, read up on common defenses, nuisances, negligence, etc., but don’t waste a lot of time on theory. Practice is the key.
2. Read the passage first and find the verbal clues
Always read the passage first. Do not read the questions first and then look at the passage. This may be your strategy for a section like Reading Comprehension, but never do it for the Logical Reasoning section.
This is because prior knowledge cannot be applied in this section. You should follow whatever is written in the passage. Do not use any additional information which you may have read during your CLAT preparation. Answer the questions using only the information given in the passage.
Also, qualifying words such as ‘provided’, ‘unless’, and ‘subject to the subject’ etc. serve as important clues as to what the question really wants to ask you. All such rules stipulate a number of conditions and exceptions that need to be checked while applying the principles to a given set of facts.
Even though verbal reasoning is a part of the logical reasoning section of the exam, it should be understood that both the logical reasoning section and the logical reasoning section of the entrance exam essentially attempt to evaluate your analytical abilities, and it is quite common for them Is. Questions with a similar underlying pattern.
If your verbal reasoning is strong, you will benefit from two sections instead of just one. Therefore, it is important for you to understand the meaning of these words and also to practice many questions related to verbal reasoning.
3. Select the ‘Most Suitable’ option
It is noteworthy that almost none of the popular law entrances demands a correct answer. Instead, these tests specifically ask for answers that are ‘most accurate’, ‘most appropriate’, etcetera.
It is quite common for students to get confused between two options, both of which seem right to them. In such scenarios, you should always choose the option that is closest to the principle applied.
Being closest to the theory does not mean that the choice and the language used in the question/theory must be the same, but rather it means that there is a large correlation between the choice and the correct application of the theory involved.
4. Strictly follow the principle
In the Logical Reasoning section, you will find theory-of-fact questions providing a set of logical principles and you will be asked to apply these principles to the given facts.
Your task is to analyze the given information to arrive at the most appropriate conclusion and nothing else. It is unimportant whether the theory is true or not. If the logical principle given in the question is changed then the solution of a question may be wrong.
It is also possible that examiners may deliberately give you principles that are legally incapable of dismissing you, but you should strictly enforce these principles without questioning the veracity of them.
Therefore, it is worth remembering that the purpose of the examiner is not to judge your logical knowledge but to assess your problem-solving abilities and your logical aptitude.
In fact, the exam pattern of CLAT has recently been revamped to weed out the questions of logical knowledge and focus even more on reasoning.
Thus, you should not let assumptions, prejudices, value systems and outside knowledge of the law influence your decision making when you have been specifically given a set of principles to base your answers on.
The passages given in the exam are usually of 450-500 words. Thus, it is necessary to distinguish between the relevant theory and supporting statements outlined in the passage.
Don’t get bogged down in irrelevant facts that serve as additional information, and are in no way related to the main theory. It is something that you learn with practice. So, practice as many passages as you can, do not attempt only objective one-liner questions.
Also Read: How to Qualify Law Entrance Exam