It’s common to read a book or watch a movie in which a character has a near-death experience. They see their life flash before their eyes at the moment of reckoning, a replay of all the most significant events from their past.
Many people, including some scientists, have reported undergoing what researchers call a “life review experience” or LRE. Eben Alexander claims to have spoken to God in a near-death experience. Without much evidence to support the existence of LREs, the best research can do is lump these LREs with dreamlike or hallucinatory experiences. The author of a new study published in the book “Consciousness and Cognition” takes a different approach to evaluating LREs, adding both statistical and neurological support to the argument that they do exist.
Judith Katz, a neurologist at Hadassah University in Jerusalem led a team of researchers to analyses seven accounts of LREs that they had put together through in-depth interviews. They found that the stories all had several things in common, including a few details that contradicted conventional ideas on what an LRE should look like. The order of events was rarely chronological, and interviewees revealed that they witnessed their life events in random order or simultaneously. Here’s what a contributor had to say about the timeline of their LRE:
“There’s lack of time limits, and there’s no linear progression. I was not in time/space, so this question also feels impossible because it was like being there for centuries. It happens once, and I experience some within my near-death, though my human mind separates them into different events and my experience was going on with others experience at the same time”.
The inclusion of deeply emotional experiences from the perspective of others close to them is another common element of LREs. Here’s what another participant had to say: “I can individually go to each person, and I could feel the pain that they went through in their life. I was opportune to see that part of their life and feel for myself what they’re feeling”.
Another example: “I believe this thing about my father when I saw myself, and he was sharing with me how things were difficult for him and some things of is early childhood”.
In fact, all interviewees in the research said they experienced a significant change in perspective regarding notable people in their lives or important life events after their LRE.
The standard trends across all the LREs in the study help to advance research in finding a definition; they add credibility to the argument that the phenomenon is real. However, researchers would have to identify what’s happening in the brain in order to better understand LREs. Researchers focus on areas of the brain that store autobiographical memories—prefrontal, parietal cortices, or medial temporal, all of which fall into the same category and are particularly vulnerable to blood loss and hypoxia resulting from traumatic near-death experiences.
The author conducted an online survey about LREs. The research found that things like déjà vu or remorse around the certain things in their lives suggested that the LRE phenomenon is shared by the general population and is based on alteration of the standard neurocognitive mechanism and oxygen deprivation.
It’s not the brain that reacts to the threat of death in some special and mystical way if your life flashes before your eyes; it’s the super-concentrated form of mental processes that happen every day. If the research is correct, see your life flash before your eyes. When you are in a bit of danger is normal.
“There’s the absence of time cutoff points, and there’s no direct movement. I was not in time/space, so this question additionally feels unthinkable in light of the fact. That it resembled being there for a really long time. It happens once, and I experience some inside my close passing. However, my human psyche isolates them into various occasions and my experience was happening with others’ experience simultaneously”.
The incorporation of profoundly profound encounters according to the viewpoint of others near them is one more typical component of LREs. One more member needed to say: “I can separately go to every individual. Or I could feel the aggravation that they carried on within their life. It was advantageous to see that piece of their life and feel for myself what they’re feeling”.
Another model: “I accept this thing about my dad when I saw myself. He was imparting to me how things were challenging for himself and a few things of his youth”.
Truth be told, all interviewees in the examination said they encountered a tremendous significant impact. The context in regards to eminent individuals in their lives or significant life-altering situations after their LRE.
The standard patterns across all the LREs in the review help to propel research in tracking down a definition. They add believability to the contention that the peculiarity is genuine. Specialists would need to recognize what’s going on in the cerebrum to more readily grasp LREs. Analysts center around the region of the cerebrum that store self-portraying recollections prefrontal, parietal cortices, or average worldly.
It’s generally expected to peruse a book or watch a film wherein a person has a brush with death. They see their life fly away with a sense of finality right now of retribution. A replay of the multitude of most critical occasions from before.
Many individuals, including a few researchers, have detailed going through what scientists call a “daily existence survey insight” or LRE. Eben Alexander professes to have addressed God in a brush with death. Everything exploration can manage is not these LREs with fanciful or dreamlike encounters. The writer of another review distributed in the book “Cognizance and Cognition” adopts an alternate strategy for assessing LREs. Adding both factual and neurological help to the contention that they do exist.
Judith Katz, a nervous system specialist at Hadassah University in Jerusalem drove a group of scientists to break down seven records of LREs. That they had assembled through top to bottom meetings. They found that the tales all shared a few things for all intents and purposes. Remembering a couple of subtleties that went against traditional thoughts of what an LRE ought to resemble. The request for occasions was seldom sequential, and interviewees uncovered. They saw their life altering situations in the irregular requests or all the while
“There’s the shortfall of time limits, and there’s no immediate development. I was not in time/space, so this question furthermore feels unfathomable considering. The way that it looked like being there for quite a while. It happens once, and I experience some inside my nearby passing, notwithstanding. My human mind segregates them into different events and my experience was occurring with others’ experience all the while”.
The fuse of significantly significant experiences as per the perspective of others. Them is another average part of LREs. Another part expected to say: “I can independently go to each person, and I could feel the disturbance that they carried on inside their life. Seeing that piece of their life and feel for myself what they’re feeling was favorable”.
Another model: “I acknowledge this thing about my father. When I saw myself, and he was giving to me. How things were trying for him and a couple of things of his childhood”.
Honestly, all interviewees in the assessment said they experienced a huge critical effect. The setting concerning prominent people in their lives or huge life-changing circumstances after their LRE.