The P/E ratio measures how cheaply valued a company’s stock price is by dividing the current stock price to its earnings-per-share (EPS). It indicates the dollar amount an investor can expect to invest in a company to receive $1 of that company’s earnings. Asiasec Properties P/E ratio is 8.98. it has decreased in comparison to the same period last year. this metric is one of the most popular because it easily summarizes the status of the company. however, in order to make an informed decision, more metrics should be analysed. Let’s dive into Asiasec Properties’s P/E ratio
What is Asiasec Properties P/E Ratio?
Asiasec Properties’ P/E ratio is 8.98, which represents a 77.91 % decrease from the same period last year. their average P/E ratio is 27.21 and their 5-year average is 14.51.
What is Asiasec Properties Net EPS?
Asiasec Properties’ net earnings for the most recent quarter were 0.05, which represents a 37.5% decrease from the same period last year.
Who are Asiasec Properties Competitors?
Based on Jika.io AI model, Great China Properties Holdings, Tai Sang Land Development, Silver Grant International Holdings Group, Chinney Investments, Multifield International Holdings, China Sandi Holdings, Easyknit International Holdings, China City Infrastructure Group are considered to be Asiasec Properties’s competitors because the companies operate within the same industry as Asiasec Properties and are targeting the same customer base. in addition, competitors typically share a similar market capitalization as Asiasec Properties.
Who is Asiasec Properties’s Biggest competitor?
Asiasec Properties’ biggest competitor is Great China Properties Holdings, based on the Jika.io AI model. it has a similar market capitalization to Asiasec Properties within the industry, it dominates a similar share of the market as Asiasec Properties, and it provides and markets very similar services.
What industry is Asiasec Properties in?
Asiasec Properties is part of the Real Estate Services and Real Estate Sector.
Asiasec Properties vs Great China Properties Holdings
Market Cap: Asiasec Properties’s Market Cap of 521081376 is higher than Great China Properties Holdings Market Cap of 508829472.
Average Volume: Asiasec Properties’s Average Volume of 34717.0 is higher than Great China Properties Holdings Average Volume of 104916.0.
Beta: Asiasec Properties’s Beta of 0.49 is lower than Great China Properties Holdings Beta of 0.77.
Revenue: Asiasec Properties’s Revenue of 36.666M is higher than Great China Properties Holdings Revenue of 10.018M.
Net Income: Asiasec Properties’s Net Income of -1.563B is lower than Great China Properties Holdings Net Income of -47.673M.
Gross Profit: Asiasec Properties’s Gross Profit of 0.0 is lower than Great China Properties Holdings Gross Profit of 5.128M.
Ebitda: Asiasec Properties’s Ebitda of -1.55B is lower than Great China Properties Holdings Ebitda of -44.919M.
P/B Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/B Ratio of 0.32 is lower than Great China Properties Holdings P/B Ratio of 0.51.
P/FCF Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/FCF Ratio of 19.79 is higher than Great China Properties Holdings P/FCF Ratio of -12.11.
ROE: Asiasec Properties’s ROE of 0.02 is higher than Great China Properties Holdings ROE of 0.0.
ROA: Asiasec Properties’s ROA of 0.03 is higher than Great China Properties Holdings ROA of 0.0.
Return On Capital Employed: Asiasec Properties’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.01 is higher than Great China Properties Holdings Return On Capital Employed of 0.0.
Assets (Total): Asiasec Properties’s Assets (Total) of 1.791B is lower than Great China Properties Holdings Assets (Total) of 2.363B.
Debt (Total): Asiasec Properties’s Debt (Total) of 0.0 is lower than Great China Properties Holdings Debt (Total) of 1.389M.
Shareholders Equity: Asiasec Properties’s Shareholders Equity of 1.605B is lower than Great China Properties Holdings Shareholders Equity of 991.01M.
Asiasec Properties vs Tai Sang Land Development
Market Cap: Asiasec Properties’s Market Cap of 521081376 is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Market Cap of 1173693696.
Average Volume: Asiasec Properties’s Average Volume of 34717.0 is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Average Volume of 4644.0.
Beta: Asiasec Properties’s Beta of 0.49 is higher than Tai Sang Land Development Beta of 0.11.
Revenue: Asiasec Properties’s Revenue of 36.666M is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Revenue of 407.024M.
Net Income: Asiasec Properties’s Net Income of -1.563B is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Net Income of 633.618M.
Gross Profit: Asiasec Properties’s Gross Profit of 0.0 is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Gross Profit of 270.586M.
Ebitda: Asiasec Properties’s Ebitda of -1.55B is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Ebitda of 699.243M.
P/E Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/E Ratio of 8.99 is higher than Tai Sang Land Development P/E Ratio of 1.85.
P/S Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/S Ratio of 9.57 is higher than Tai Sang Land Development P/S Ratio of 3.17.
P/B Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/B Ratio of 0.32 is higher than Tai Sang Land Development P/B Ratio of 0.14.
P/FCF Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/FCF Ratio of 19.79 is higher than Tai Sang Land Development P/FCF Ratio of -42.16.
ROE: Asiasec Properties’s ROE of 0.02 is lower than Tai Sang Land Development ROE of 0.05.
ROA: Asiasec Properties’s ROA of 0.03 is lower than Tai Sang Land Development ROA of 0.04.
Return On Capital Employed: Asiasec Properties’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.01 is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Return On Capital Employed of 0.01.
Gross Profit Margin: Asiasec Properties’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.0 is lower than Tai Sang Land Development Gross Profit Margin of 0.75.
Asiasec Properties vs Silver Grant International Holdings Group
Market Cap: Asiasec Properties’s Market Cap of 521081376 is lower than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Market Cap of 921939968.
Average Volume: Asiasec Properties’s Average Volume of 34717.0 is lower than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Average Volume of 401050.0.
Beta: Asiasec Properties’s Beta of 0.49 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Beta of 0.2.
Revenue: Asiasec Properties’s Revenue of 36.666M is lower than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Revenue of 87.478M.
Net Income: Asiasec Properties’s Net Income of -1.563B is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Net Income of -1.453B.
Gross Profit: Asiasec Properties’s Gross Profit of 0.0 is lower than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Gross Profit of 81.568M.
Ebitda: Asiasec Properties’s Ebitda of -1.55B is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Ebitda of -1.027B.
P/E Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/E Ratio of 8.99 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group P/E Ratio of 16.53.
P/S Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/S Ratio of 9.57 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group P/S Ratio of 8.56.
P/B Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/B Ratio of 0.32 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group P/B Ratio of 0.18.
P/FCF Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/FCF Ratio of 19.79 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group P/FCF Ratio of -3.67.
ROE: Asiasec Properties’s ROE of 0.02 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group ROE of 0.01.
ROA: Asiasec Properties’s ROA of 0.03 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group ROA of 0.0.
Return On Capital Employed: Asiasec Properties’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.01 is higher than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Return On Capital Employed of -0.01.
Gross Profit Margin: Asiasec Properties’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.0 is lower than Silver Grant International Holdings Group Gross Profit Margin of 0.94.
Asiasec Properties vs Chinney Investments
Market Cap: Asiasec Properties’s Market Cap of 521081376 is lower than Chinney Investments Market Cap of 827052032.
Average Volume: Asiasec Properties’s Average Volume of 34717.0 is lower than Chinney Investments Average Volume of 8440.0.
Beta: Asiasec Properties’s Beta of 0.49 is lower than Chinney Investments Beta of 0.8.
Revenue: Asiasec Properties’s Revenue of 36.666M is higher than Chinney Investments Revenue of 1.278B.
Net Income: Asiasec Properties’s Net Income of -1.563B is lower than Chinney Investments Net Income of 77.876M.
Gross Profit: Asiasec Properties’s Gross Profit of 0.0 is lower than Chinney Investments Gross Profit of 639.239M.
Ebitda: Asiasec Properties’s Ebitda of -1.55B is lower than Chinney Investments Ebitda of 513.191M.
P/E Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/E Ratio of 8.99 is higher than Chinney Investments P/E Ratio of 10.0.
P/S Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/S Ratio of 9.57 is higher than Chinney Investments P/S Ratio of 1.29.
P/B Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/B Ratio of 0.32 is higher than Chinney Investments P/B Ratio of 0.1.
P/FCF Ratio: Asiasec Properties’s P/FCF Ratio of 19.79 is lower than Chinney Investments P/FCF Ratio of 2.82.
ROE: Asiasec Properties’s ROE of 0.02 is higher than Chinney Investments ROE of -0.0.
ROA: Asiasec Properties’s ROA of 0.03 is higher than Chinney Investments ROA of -0.0.
Return On Capital Employed: Asiasec Properties’s Return On Capital Employed of 0.01 is lower than Chinney Investments Return On Capital Employed of 0.01.
Gross Profit Margin: Asiasec Properties’s Gross Profit Margin of 0.0 is lower than Chinney Investments Gross Profit Margin of 0.59.
Assets (Total): Asiasec Properties’s Assets (Total) of 1.791B is lower than Chinney Investments Assets (Total) of 21.294B.
Debt (Total): Asiasec Properties’s Debt (Total) of 0.0 is lower than Chinney Investments Debt (Total) of 6.477B.
About Asiasec Properties
Asiasec Properties Limited, an investment holding company, is engaged in property investment, property leasing and estate management, primarily in Hong Kong. its investment properties include commercial and residential properties, as well as car parks. the company also provides financing services. the company was previously known as Dan Form Holdings Company Limited and changed its name to Asiasec Properties Limited in June 2017. the company was established in 1973 and is based in Wan Chai, Hong Kong. Asiasec Properties Limited is a subsidiary of Autobest Holdings Limited.
